So what is the upside potential for NPK shares?
Jul 28, 2008
NPK -- “Da Bulls” Part II
Jul 22, 2008
NPK -- "Da Bulls" Part I (Corrected)
Instead of subtracting tax expense from free cash flow, I was adding it back and therefore substantially inflating free cash flow estimates. The other change I made is to decrease the amount spent on CAPEX as the small apps business declines in revenue.
These changes produced a substantially lower per share value for the small apps business of $15 which lowered the worst case scenario share price estimate for NPK to $45 from previously estimated $61. Under this new worst case scenario the worst case scenario downside increases to aproximately 30% from the previously posted 8% downside risk.
Instead of reposting with the correct numbers here is the new calculation.
* DISCLOSURE: I or accounts I manage may be long or short any and/or all stocks mentioned in this post. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. For informational and educational purposes only.
Jul 21, 2008
NPK -- “Da Bulls” Part I
For the absorbents business I simply assume that its dumped on someone else’s lap at ½ CAPEX over the last 4 years which produces a $2 per share business value.
The last two pieces are the working capital from the two liquidated businesses as well as the current cash on hand which combined is estimated to be worth $24 per share.
My detailed calculations can be viewed here.
The sum of parts valuation under these assumptions is $61 per share which is $5 or 8% below the current price of approximately $66 per share. A worst case scenario downside of 8% is substantially smaller than the potential upside under even modest positive assumptions which will be discussed in the next post.
* DISCLOSURE: I or accounts I manage may be long or short any and/or all stocks mentioned in this post. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. For informational and educational purposes only.
Jul 17, 2008
NPK -- “Da Bears”
As with all the stocks profiled on this blog the laundry list of problems with National Presto (NPK) is long and deep. NPK’s second largest business is facing both short and long term pressures, success of the company’s defense business is based on large government contracts that may not be renewed, the company’s management has invested both time and money into the diapers business with very poor results thus far, and the stock is highly illiquid.
National Presto’s appliance business has experienced 1.6% annual sales growth over the last 8 years with the company constantly stating that it cannot raise prices fast enough.
While the decision in 1999 to outsource manufacturing to
There is very little visibility in the defense business. Management has not indicated what percentage of defense revenue comes from the Department of Defense (DoD) and what percentage from other sources (police force, etc.). The company has not provided any indication of whether they expect the Department of Defense (DoD) to expand the $1.3B contract after it is filled.
NPK’s fillings state that it expects to deliver $550M of the $1.3B contract (up from initial award of $300M) and based on my calculation the $550M will be mostly filled by the end of fiscal 2008. If this business is not replaced, company EBITDA will fall by approximately 50%.
There is not much to say about the absorbents business other than it’s a mess, no pun intended.
After combing through old SEC fillings, I calculate that since 2001 NPK has invested $36M in CAPEX for total EBITDA of $8M. The annual rate of return has been 3% and that is without including working capital in the equation. This is a very low margin, highly competitive business that is exposed to severe swings in commodity costs (wood pulp and energy) and NPK is never going to be a cost leader in this industry.
* DISCLOSURE: I or accounts I manage may be long or short any and/or all stocks mentioned in this post. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. For informational and educational purposes only.
Apr 10, 2008
NPK -- First Look
Current Price: $51
Market Value: $350M
Investment Type: Classic Value
Despite all the “noise,” NPK had an outstanding operating year. Revenues grew 38% (on top of 65% growth in the previous year) and operating income great 50% (after growing 83% the year before). The company ended the 2007 fiscal year with $142M in cash & securities and no long term debt after paying $4.25 per share dividend on 3/2008 and $3.80 per share a year before.
* DISCLOSURE: I or accounts I manage may be long or short any and/or all stocks mentioned in this post. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any security. For informational and educational purposes only.
Apr 7, 2008
The Quintessential Buffet
I was cleaning out some old emails and ran across this NYT article dated
This article follows the basic boiler plate for Buffet related articles, mentioning that Berkshire is doing well while others are suffering, that buffet has added to his positions in USB and WFC, and talks about new positions in BNI and KMX (it was later released that KMX was bought by Lou Simpson who is the CIO at GEICO and a Superinvestor in his own right).
I think most agree that Buffet and a select few other professional investors are simply better at their chosen profession than everyone else, much the same way that Michael Jordan and Tiger Woods are better and will always be better than everyone else.
Apr 5, 2008
FTAR Makes it Official
[**I am still trying to figure out how to post Excel tables in Blogger so I will add my calculations for the $7 and $8.4 price as soon as I get a hang of this. If you have any suggestion on how I can do this other than posting a picture file that is all but unreadable let me know at offthebeatenpathinvestments@gmail.com]
The biggest difference between the worst and best case scenarios is my estimate of 2008 FCF generated by FTAR. In the worst case I assume sales down 10% over 2007 and some margin erosion while in the best case I assume flat YoY sales and slight margin expansion.